223 results for 'cat:"Damages" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Frimpong grants the Nevada corporations a default judgment of $1.3 million in damages for their complaint that the construction company's subcontractors did not complete the unfinished work left by non-party Icon Identity Solutions. The construction company's lack of participation in this litigation would prejudice the Nevada corporations without default judgment. Also, the Nevada corporations successfully plead that the subcontractors did not uphold their end of the parties' deal.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Frimpong, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 8:22cv30, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: damages, contract
J. Males finds a lower court properly dismissed a married couple's contract claims against a cruise company. The married couple argued that they are entitled to a refund after the cruise operators switched routes from Northwest passage of Canada to the west coast of Greenland, claiming that the "experience was hell." However, the cruise company sufficiently showed in court that the couple did not cancel plans when the route was modified. Affirmed.
Court: Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, Judge: Males, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: CA-2023-623, Categories: damages, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Tijerina finds that the lower court properly ruled in favor of the city in this breach of contract case arising from an agreement to perform certain road improvements. On appeal, the construction companies contend that the evidence is insufficient to establish their breach of the contract. But the evidence showed a "failure to adhere to the progress schedule." Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Tijerina, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 13-22-00416-CV, Categories: Evidence, damages, contract
J. Wilson finds that the appellate division improperly dismissed a developer's claims seeking damages for breach of a redevelopment contract based on repudiation. The agreement to turn a single-room-occupancy hotel into a mixed-use residential/commercial building required that the site include some low-income housing, which was complicated by a subsequent court settlement mandating the addition of rent-stabilized units. Written notification stating the property owner could not agree to the latter as altering the parties' original contract supported allegations of anticipatory repudiation. Reversed in part.
Court: New York Court Of Appeals, Judge: Wilson, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 30, Categories: damages, contract
J. Fischer finds that while the port authority is an arm of the state, it is not exempt or immune from being assessed prejudgment interest in the current case, where the developer obtained a judgment as a creditor for the port's breach of a development contract. Therefore, the case must be remanded for a proper calculation of interest. Reversed.
Court: Ohio Supreme Court, Judge: Fischer, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1501, Categories: Government, damages, contract
J. Brown finds that the district court properly determined that a gas supplier breached its industrial gas supply contract with a chemical manufacturer and properly awarded $88 million in lost profits. The manufacturer's counsel maintained that he could prove to the jury that the damages claim for lost profits and cover damages were valued at $100 million, and the district court used the proper model for calculating damages. Further, the manufacturer shows that there were lost sales due to the breach of contract based on testimony and evidence. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Brown, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2022-CA-0777, Categories: Energy, damages, contract
J. Chou finds that the trial court properly faulted an employer for breaching an employment contract's stock option provision. But the $4.3 million damages award was miscalculated since it measured the employee's damages from the date of the breach without factoring in what the parties "reasonably contemplated" when forming their contract. The calculation offered by the employee's expert properly measured the damages on the date a lock-up period ended and the employee was free to sell, so the damages award must be increased by $2.3 million. Reversed in part.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Chou, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: A165372, Categories: Employment, damages, contract
Per curiam, the Texas Supreme Court finds that the court of appeals improperly ruled in favor of a homeowner in a damages case he filed against the seller of his home. When the seller sought to initiate arbitration of the issue under the home purchase agreement, the homeowner argued that he could not be compelled to arbitrate because the cost would be unconscionable. The court of appeals held that the arbitration costs were excessive and unenforceable. As a matter of process, the homeowner should have raised the issue of costs with the arbitrator before continuing in the courts. Furthermore, the homeowner failed to show evidence of how the cost of arbitrating the issue was unreasonable but litigating the issue in court was less costly. Reversed.
Court: Texas Supreme Court, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 5, 2024, Case #: 22-0830, Categories: Arbitration, damages, contract
J. DeGravelles grants a request by foreign and domestic insurers, ordering a stay of a nonprofit condominium owners’ suit for recovery of repairs for wind and hailstorm damage, pending arbitration of claims. The condo owners fail to support their argument the arbitration provision is unenforceable.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: DeGravelles, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv279, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Arbitration, damages, contract
J. Lewis grants the medical transport service's request for default judgment, awarding it $469,000 in damages and interest. The service subcontracted to provide transport for Veterans Affairs, the company under which it contracted later having a controlling interest obtained by the other party to this suit. This party failed to pay the service after it entered into a new contract with the service. The service has established the new contractor failed to perform under the contract.
Court: USDC South Carolina Aiken, Judge: Lewis , Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv2801, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Government, damages, contract
J. Kelley grants a recruiting firm’s motion for default judgment against a supplier that agreed to provide an engineer to the firm’s client, but then knowingly provided an imposter, requiring the client to have a forensic audit performed when they realized an imposter had been hired. The recruiting firm paid over $55,000 to cover the audit as a way to work towards maintaining a positive relationship with the client. The recruiting firm makes a plausible showing for all of its claims, including breach of contract, tortious interference and deceptive trade practices.
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Kelley, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv11871, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: damages, Interference With contract, contract
J. Swan finds the superior court properly affirmed a magistrate's decision ordering the homeowner to pay $1,706 to the contractor for work he did remodeling her kitchen. The record shows that both the homeowner and the contractor breached the parties' work contract, so the magistrate properly apportioned liability between both of them, and the homeowner's appeals based on the magistrate shifting the burden of proof to her, disallowing her from calling witnesses, and awarding the contractor damages for her failure to pay him for electrical work all fail.
Court: Virgin Islands Supreme Court, Judge: Swan, Filed On: March 26, 2024, Case #: 2024 VI 15, Categories: damages, contract
J. Leichty denies various insurers' motions for judgment as a matter of law. The owner of a warehouse whose property was damaged in a flood sued several insurance companies for breach of contract, which were found to be liable for various environmental and electrical damages. The jury was not unreasonable by taking the most conservative estimate for environmental remediation. The owner presented sufficient evidence for the jury to find the insurers acted in bad faith in coopting the expert engineer the owner hired for representation to protect the insurers.
Court: USDC Northern District of Indiana, Judge: Leichty , Filed On: March 22, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv227, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, damages, contract
J. Rowland partially grants both a commuter rail service’s and a construction company’s motions for summary judgment on damage claims. This case is a contract dispute between the parties over a rail replacement project that the commuter rail paid the construction company to undertake. The construction company finished the project long after its contractual deadline, but it alleges that the delay was partly the commuter rail service’s own fault. The court will allow the commuter rail service to seek damages for structural steel storage, crosshole sonic logging testing, field office credit, additional review and subcontractor mechanic liens. The construction company can pursue damages for late payments plus interest.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Rowland, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv2901, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Construction, damages, contract
J. Jackson denies a magistrate judge’s recommended amount of $84,000 in contractual damages for a prevailing contractor’s failure-to-perform judgment against a fabricator of countertops. The recommendation would put the prevailing litigant in “a better position” than it would have been if the counter-top maker had performed as promised. stead, the prevailing contractor is awarded $68,000 in contractual damages and $46,000 in attorney fees.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Papillion, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 3:19cv781, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: damages, Attorney Fees, contract
J. Garaufis finds two individuals liable on breach of contract claims for their failure to pay the principal or interest on a $2 million loan and awards the litigants the same amount in damages. The defendants fail to present any material evidence that would suggest they were fraudulently induced into signing the loan notes. The court directs the parties to recalculate how much the litigants are entitled to in unpaid and pre-judgment interest.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Garaufis, Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv7303, NOS: Negotiable Instrument - Contract, Categories: Fraud, damages, contract
J. Jenkins partially grants the suing personal protective equipment manufacturer’s motion to dismiss the defendant capital investment firm’s counterclaims, brought as part of an ongoing contract dispute between the parties. Both parties accuse the other, in various ways, of ruining a deal between them to make and sell personal protective equipment during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic. In response to the manufacturer’s lawsuit and refusal to hand over $8 million in profits, the capital investment firm brought counterclaims for contract breach, conversion, accounting and violations of the Illinois Sales Representative Act. The court strikes the investment firm’s accounting claim and several affirmative defenses, and dismisses its conversion and Illinois Sales Representative Act violation claim. It may still pursue damages against the manufacturer in a limited capacity.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Jenkins, Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv1094, NOS: Constitutionality of State Statutes - Other Suits, Categories: damages, Accounting Malpractice, contract
J. Marbley grants the buyer's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ruling that its inability to obtain sufficient electrical power to supply the commercial property gave it a legitimate reason to terminate the contract prior to closing and allow it to recover the $300,000 in earnest money, which must be returned by the seller.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Marbley, Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv4280, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Real Estate, damages, contract
J. Males finds a lower court properly dismissed a Japanese owned container ship company's contract claims against a maritime salvage service. The container ship company argued that the salvage service did not perform one time salvage services, but instead performed services via a pre- existent contract. However, the salvage service sufficiently showed in court that that the container ship company is entitled to pay remuneration for successfully refloating the vessel. Affirmed.
Court: Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, Judge: Males, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: CA-2023-798, Categories: Maritime, damages, contract
J. Coulson recommends granting in part a home medical company’s motion for default judgment in this counterclaim contract dispute brought by a supply company. The counterclaim for breach of contract should be granted for liability against the supply company. However, the claims for negligent or intentional misrepresentation and promissory estoppel should be denied. It is also recommended that the medical company be awarded over $2.7 million in damages for the actual profits for the sale of medical gowns.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Coulson, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv2479, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: damages, contract